In a legal saga marked by twists, a federal judge in California expressed concerns about the defense strategy for Alexander Smirnov, a former FBI informant indicted for allegedly lying about President Joe Biden’s family and their purported dealings in Ukraine.

Smirnov faced a tumultuous week, initially released from custody in Nevada before swiftly being re-arrested by the FBI on identical charges.

Prosecutors have consistently argued that Smirnov poses a flight risk, citing his numerous international connections. Despite their efforts, a judge in Nevada opted to release him, prompting swift re-arrest.

District Judge Otis Wright, overseeing Smirnov’s case in California, raised suspicions about the defense’s intentions, suggesting they may be facilitating his potential flight from the United States. However, Judge Wright did not provide concrete evidence to support this assertion.

The judge scheduled a detention hearing for Smirnov in Los Angeles, scheduled for Monday, to address these concerns. Meanwhile, Smirnov’s defense team has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, refuting claims that they are aiding their client’s escape from justice.

In a court filing, Smirnov’s attorneys defended their actions, emphasizing their commitment to representing their client within the bounds of the law.

Amidst the legal wrangling, Smirnov’s defense has also filed an appeal against his current detention, arguing that he should have the opportunity for a hearing in Nevada before being transferred to California. They contend that Judge Wright exceeded his authority by issuing a new arrest warrant without due process.

The case has garnered significant attention, with Smirnov’s attorneys stressing the importance of upholding the rule of law. They assert that the court’s actions have pre-judged the issue of detention, undermining public confidence in the legal proceedings.